Philadelphia Injury Attorney Blog

For the last three and a half decades as an experienced catastrophic injury lawyer whose law firm has litigated tens of thousands of cases, I was not surprised to learn that one of the most frequent causes of accidents is not texting, watching videos, or using cell phones, but wearing inappropriate footwear.

Recently, I was retained to prosecute an amusement park accident case whereupon a man sustained crippling injuries due to the fact he was allowed to wear non-skid water shoes on a water slide. In fact, unlike many other water parks who totally prohibit the use of water shoes on water slides, this well-branded national amusement park sold water shoes with a non-skid rubber sole indicating that the park’s owners or operators were more concerned with boosting bottom line profitability rather than concentrating on the safety concerns of park visitors, which should be priority number one.

Continue reading "Inappropriate Footwear is a Leading Cause of Many Accidents in the United States" »

Statistics indicate that an estimated 18 million people a year will use commercial zip lines, but many are not aware that there is currently little or no state and Federal regulations regarding zip lines.

Many times while on a cruise or another “adventure in paradise”, consumers are enticed to ride zip lines over canyons, zoos, rain forest canopies, water, fire, and gorges – the ultimate thrill seeking adventure. Typically a zip line requires the rider to hang from a harness as they travel from a higher elevation point to a lower point using gravity as the power source. It is not uncommon to reach speeds of 50 to 60 mph. There are currently hundreds of zip line rides available in the United States as they have dramatically increased in popularity. I was recently on a cruise ship with my family in the Caribbean and the ship’s activity guide video in our room promoted zip lines at almost every island in which we stopped.

As an experienced zip line accident lawyer, unfortunately I deal with many cases involving catastrophic injury and fatalities resulting from zip line accidents.

We were recently contacted by an individual who was catastrophically injured on a zip line that was newly installed in a major ski resort. The client was required to sign a waiver before strapping on the harness, and the waiver allegedly released the company from any and all liability in the case of severe injury and even death.

Continue reading "With Little or No State and Federal Regulation Regarding Zip Lines, Consumers May Not Always Understand the Risks of Injuries or Death" »

Flying down a zip line suspended in air is becoming more and more popular throughout the United States and other countries.

I recently took a cruise with my family and on three of the islands we visited, shore excursions or adventures of the day included a zip line adventure. In fact, my ship even had a zip line on board as a thrill attraction. Every year, millions of thrill seekers become zip line enthusiasts and the zip line amusement industry is booming. But at what cost? Statistics indicate that approximately 18 to 20 million people ride commercially operated zip lines annually according to the Association For Challenge Course Technology. Even more riders travel on non-commercial zip lines.

Since the year 2000, the zip line industry has grown exponentially and many states have no specific regulations, and in fact, there are no federal laws specifically dealing with zip lines. Unfortunately due to there being no regulation of zip lines, many accidents occur due to snapped lines or equipment failures.

As an experienced Pennsylvania amusement accident attorney, I am aware of one thing for certain, that questions about amusement and zip line safety are not new. However, relatively little has been done to address these issues. Unfortunately, many zip line ride manufacturers, owners, operators, and insurers may handle the safety of zip lines as they choose. Participants who are unaware of the risks of such a ride have no idea what to expect or how to react in a dangerous situation and can often end up with fractures, spinal injuries, or worse yet, death.

Recently a Georgia woman was severely injured when a zip line snapped on a 24-year-old woman’s second ride, sending the nature loving thrill seeker onto the rocks beneath, leaving her with a life threatening injury. Although the zip line industry professionals insist that accidents are rare and safety is paramount, I beg to differ.

The amusement ride accident lawyers of Reiff & Bily understand that prosecuting a zip line accident case often involves a combination of legal theories including, but not limited to, product liability, negligence, premises liability, criminal liability, and potential inadequate security issues. In most zip line accident cases, defendants will assert that most victims assume the risk and that he or she recognized the dangers inherent in the activity. However, our skilled attorneys and experts understand that a victim cannot assume concealed risks or those risks of which he or she is unaware. Until the federal government and state governments close these safety loopholes and properly address a current patchwork of amusement accident regulations and zip line accident regulations, it is left to amusement park accident attorneys to protect the rights of the people who seek fun and not injury when they sign up for a zip line adventure.

At Reiff & Bily, we have over three decades of experience representing those who are catastrophically injured and family members of those wrongfully killed. We are proud to announce that we have recently been named to the Top 100 Trial Lawyers by National Trial Lawyers Association and Top 100 Attorneys in Pennsylvania and Philadelphia. We always offer a free, no obligation consultation and believe that consumer safety is priority number one rather than the profitability of amusement attraction and zip line operators.

While the Consumer Protection Safety Commission estimates that the number of serious injuries on amusement park rides continue to increase dramatically, there are serious loopholes in the Consumer Product Safety Act of 1981 which prohibits the CPSC from regulating and enforcing the safety of all rides that are fixed to a specific site. Unfortunately, there is no official source which keeps a complete record of amusement park accidents. As an experienced amusement park accident attorney who has investigated and litigated some of the most horrific amusement park accidents that one can imagine, the one thing that I do understand is there is something fundamentally wrong with the checks and balances and safety protocol of the amusement park safety system as it currently exists in America.

Many times local and state regulators who currently oversee amusement parks lack effective budgets, resources, and technical expertise to carry out effective safety checks and investigate accidents. Our experiences reveal that when we conduct independent unbiased examinations and analysis of an amusement accident, the results are greatly at odds with the opinions of local regulators and authorities.

According to news sources, Lego Land in Florida reported six mishaps involving guests that occurred during its first two and a half months of operation but claim none of the instances appeared to have serious injuries. Believe it or not a Florida statute exempts Lego Land in Florida and many other major theme parks in Florida from regulation by the state bureau even though the attractions are required to submit quarterly incident reports. This exemption applies to theme parks of at least 1,000 employees and their own inspection staff. While many of the parks claim that safety is their number one concern and claim they have a duty to report any serious injuries or major incidents, the obvious question is begged as to what is a “serious incident".

I have always believed that one must stand for something or you will fall for anything. It is only when a horrific accident involving a catastrophic injury or wrongful death occurs at an amusement park that the victim or the family of the victim feels the true betrayal of an inefficient regulatory system.

Unfortunately, money, power, and greed of the amusement park industry often leads to unnecessary injuries and worse yet death.

As an experienced amusement park and carnival accident attorney, I believe that leaving the power of amusement park regulation to local and state agencies where the amusement park corporation is a major source of economic income to the community is analogous to the “fox guarding the hen house".

Amusement park safety is priority number one for the amusement park accident lawyers of Reiff and Bily. We believe that everyone deserves a safe amusement park governed by a uniform board of federal and national laws, and that cutting corners and not placing safety first is never an acceptable option.

For over three decades, I have been practicing catastrophic injury and wrongful death law and all too often a catastrophic injury or wrongful death is caused by a clear violation of laws that have minimal if any enforcement guidelines and “teeth".
Recently the Concordia cruise ship disaster illustrated just how many deaths and catastrophic injuries could be caused in an industry guided by rules that were spottily enforced. Every time an accident happens whether it involves a cruise ship, bus accident, trucking accident, amusement park accident, or product liability claim, authorities and experts are quick to state that the event is a wake-up call that highlights longstanding safety concerns.

In Philadelphia, we continue to have an escalating hit and run car accident crisis due to the fact that there are several well-known loopholes in the laws and yet legislators refuse to take steps to change and enforce codes which should in reality punish violators.

The law firm of Reiff and Bily has handled many amusement park accident cases, and yet the enforcement of these safety regulations is spotty despite the volume of rules and amount of unreported amusement park and water park accidents. Many industries escape regulatory scrutiny and it comes as no shock that catastrophic accidents occur when safety protocols are not followed and enforced. Rules and regulations without enforcement are meaningless and if the rules and regulations provide a mechanism for enforcement, individuals or corporations in positions of power often think (as demonstrated by their action or non-action) that they are above these rules and think that they can escape liability by the use of a creative lawyer or legal system which fails to enforce said rules and regulations. If our system chooses to ignore rules and regulations, it fosters a system where it is easier for individuals and corporations to become and remain corrupt then to remain honest.

I have always believed that laws not enforced cease to be laws, and rights not defended may wither away. I believe that the courtroom with proper legal representation makes equals of all men and that an injured victim must ensure that laws are followed and enforced. While catastrophic injury and personal injury lawyers will continue to be bashed by corporations and insurance companies who continue to delay, deny, and defend rightful claims, I for one understand that enforcement of laws and prosecution of wrongdoers are necessary to protect the public and promote order which is the first requisite of liberty and justice.

I have been researching, investigating, and litigating amusement park accidents, water park accidents, and hayride accidents for over three decades. I have been attacked by many individuals stating that I am nothing but a greedy lawyer taking the fun out of life. Many individuals today who are riding on safer amusement rides or using safer products quickly point the finger at lawyers and without the fight of dedicated lawyers for consumer safety and protection many products manufacturers, or amusement park operators and amusement manufacturers would still be placing profitability ahead of safety concerns.

When I meet with parents of children who were catastrophically injured or died on an amusement ride or hayride and the owner/operator points the finger at an innocent child when in fact the amusement or attraction was improperly maintained, improperly inspected, or was operated by an individual with a questionable background who was improperly trained, I am astonished to see a public relations campaign attacking lawyers who only get paid if they are able to prove fault or negligence and win a case. I am astonished and surprised to read negative posts on blogs by people who don’t have a clue as to what really happened and who most probably would also seek legal representation and an independent investigation if they or their child was catastrophically injured or killed.

Our experienced amusement park and theme park accident attorneys always work only on a contingent fee basis and only charge a fee if we win the case. Many amusement parks claim that they regulate themselves and have proper motivation to insure safety and many state agencies that regulate amusement parks don’t have the budgets or technical expertise necessary to properly do their jobs. In fact, many theme parks and amusement park operators claim that state and local legislators lack budget resources and technical experience to carry out proper safety checks and investigate accidents and claim that they can do it better. I believe that if an amusement park or water park is operating safely and taking all steps to insure that amusement ride accidents do not occur, they should not be so afraid of a lawyer double checking the system. After all, a contingent fee amusement park and theme park accident lawyer will not take the case or get paid if, in fact, it can be determined that the owners and operators did nothing wrong. For those who complain that lawyers are taking the fun out of life and always blame the victims. Think about how you would feel if you were catastrophically injured or your child was killed at a theme park or amusement park that was said to be safe and carefully hid defects and problems from the public.

Checks and balances are a good thing.